Dailymaverick logo

Business Maverick

Business Maverick, South Africa, World

After the Bell: Blunder after blunder by Transnet relegates SA to world’s worst port operations

After the Bell: Blunder after blunder by Transnet relegates SA to world’s worst port operations
The road for Transnet ports to recover, become globally competitive and open to private sector participation might be prolonged because of self-inflicted problems. High port tariffs and procurement problems are at play.

The past few days have been bad for state-owned transport group Transnet.

Two significant, but unrelated, developments point to Transnet’s enormous difficulties with reforming its port operations, which are ranked at the very bottom by the World Bank in terms of global operational efficiency and competitiveness. 

The first development concerns Transnet, which is vexing the port industry by proposing enormous increases in the tariffs it charges customers for moving their goods through eight seaports across SA. At a time when global and more slick ports are slashing port tariffs to remain competitive and attract new customers, Transnet is heading in the opposite direction. It wants to increase tariffs by a cumulative 30% over the next three years.

The second development relates to further delays in the long-awaited process to allow private sector investors to run Transnet ports for a set period while pouring in capital to spruce them up and improve efficiencies. 

This process— first floated by President Cyril Ramaphosa in 2021— has hit a snag and is now being challenged in court. In SA, the wheels of justice turn slowly, meaning that Transnet ports, without private sector intervention, might continue to underperform in 2025 and beyond, holding SA’s economy to ransom.  

Transnet ports are a crucial cog in SA’s economy, with vessels and containers moving in and out of the country carrying goods such as vehicles, fruits, timber and forest products, and mining commodities. When Transnet isn’t operating correctly, many businesses and South African exports suffer.

Bizarrely, Transnet seems to have engineered the two recent developments (the kerfuffle around port tariffs and privatisation delays) and the problems they bring.

The tariff issue is more like self-sabotage by Transnet. 

Transnet National Ports Authority (TNPA), a Transnet division responsible for the functioning of the national port system, has asked the Ports Regulator of South Africa to increase its average tariffs by 7.9% during the 2025/26 financial year.

It wants tariffs hiked by 18.61% in 2026/27 and 2.52% in 2027/28.

If approved by the regulator, the proposed tariff increases would allow the TNPA to generate revenue of R15.6-billion in 2025/26 financial year, R18.7-billion and R19.4-billion for the subsequent two years. 

The National Ports Consultative Committee (NPCC), a body that advises Transport Minister Barbara Creecy on tariffs, has trashed the TNPA for the tariff proposals. In a 35-page letter dated 7 October 2024, the NPCC has described the proposed tariffs as “high”, also warning that they “risk affecting the attractiveness of South African ports by increasing the overall cost for port users and could have a ripple effect on the broader South African economy”.

Because of this, the NPCC has recommended no increase in port tariffs or, if they increase, they should stay within the inflation rate, which was well below 6% at the date of its recommendation to Creecy.

One logistics analyst quipped to Daily Maverick: “You’d think that Transnet National Ports Authority (TNPA) would pull out all the stops to offer incentives to customers by keeping tariffs low. Instead, customers will have to deal with port inefficiencies, persistent equipment failures, labour issues and higher tariffs. This will make it difficult for the TNPA to get new customers and increase container volumes.”

Customers will likely reroute to more efficient ports, including Djibouti, Walvis Bay, Maputo, Beira, and Dar es Salaam, taking market share from SA. 

The TNPA’s tariff increase application already projects lower container volumes. Containers are referred to as 20-foot equivalent units (TEUs), which measure trade volumes at container ports.

The TNPA previously projected that its ports would handle 4.9 million TEUs in 2024/25, which has now been downgraded to 4.4 million TEUs

The TNPA has also downgraded TEU projections for the subsequent years until 2028:


  • 2025/26 - down from 5 million to 4.6 million;

  • 2026/27 - down from 6.7 million to 4.7 million;

  • 2027/28 - down from 7.2 million to 4.8 million; and

  • 2028/29 - down from 7.3 million to 4.8 million.


The fewer containers the TNPA moves, the lower its revenue will be, which will worsen its financial problems. Even the NPCC has called into question the rationale behind the TNPA asking for higher port tariffs, which should ordinarily result in higher revenue for the company and allow it to allocate more money to improve its ports, equipment and infrastructure. 

The NPCC said the TNPA’s revenue model suggests that whatever money it makes should be reinvested into its operations, but “this reinvestment is not currently taking place”, with the funds used by its parent company [Transnet] in other areas. This explains the many years of neglect and underinvestment in ports. 

Another blunder relates to Transnet’s process of awarding a contract to the Philippines-based logistics firm International Container Terminal Services Inc (ICTSI) to run, upgrade and operate a container terminal at the Durban port over the next 25 years.

This is one of many procurement processes at Transnet that has gone awry. Even Transnet board chair Andile Sangqu recently said he was “very worried” about Transnet’s state of procurement.

The contract award, first announced in July 2023, was significant because Transnet would essentially hand over the keys to ICTSI to run one of the terminals at the Durban port, SA’s most essential and busiest, handling 60% of container volumes. It was also Transnet’s first move towards any significant private sector participation and a tacit admission by Transnet that it needs help running the country’s ports. 

However, APM Terminals, the subsidiary of global shipping giant Maersk, successfully obtained a court order in October 2024 to interdict Transnet’s awarding of the Durban Container Terminal contract to ICTSI. APM Terminals also submitted a bid for the contract but lost to ICTSI. 

The high court in Durban found that Transnet’s approach in identifying ICTSI as the preferred bidder “was potentially flawed and prima facie unfair to the other bidders”. 

At the heart of the dispute are accounting metrics used by Transnet during the contract bidding process to determine ICTSI’s solvency and its ability to fund the running of Durban Container Terminal for the next two decades. Transnet used ICTSI’s market capitalisation, which APM Terminals successfully argued in court is not an indicator of solvency and financial health; net asset value was more reliable. 

Read more: High court slaps interdict order on dodgy Transnet port tender 

This week, ICTSI said it was reviewing the court’s decision to halt Transnet’s contract award and exploring all legal options to ensure that Maersk and APM Terminals do not “hold people of SA to ransom”.

The legal wranglings are likely to delay President Ramaphosa’s port reform dream. DM