Dailymaverick logo

Africa

Africa

After the Bell: Uber, motorbikes and disruption on the road to transport democratisation

There was virtually no change for 50 years, then suddenly a whole revolution in transport. And it hasn’t ended yet; there will be more disruption to come.
After the Bell: Uber, motorbikes and disruption on the road to transport democratisation

I am sure that I am not alone in finding that one of the biggest frustrations of driving - along with potholes, people who drive on the wrong side of the road, minibus taxis and traffic in general - is the huge rise in the number of people driving motorbikes.

I don’t have anything against them. They’re providing an important service (including to my home), they’re moving the economy and, most importantly, they’re getting an income for their families.

But what really irritates me is that they’re forced to drive while looking at their phones. It means that you are behind them and, firstly, scared for them because they’re not paying attention and, secondly, hugely irritated because they’re driving so slowly as a result. 

I was reminded of this when I read a report that Uber is now offering what was always going to be the end point of their disruptions in how we get around.

Instead of spending money and wasting space in a car, now, in some places, you can get a ride on the back of a motorbike.

You can imagine the advantage of this: it’s hugely cheap and so many journeys really involve one customer.

It also increases your options. You can spend a fortune and arrive at an event in splendid isolation in an Uber Black, rush to that important meeting in a Comfort, just go to work in a Go, or, if you’re strapped for cash (and who isn’t!), use their motorbike service.

It makes so much sense. So often you see someone using the Bolt service, being driven around in a little orange Qute that isn’t even a car. Technically, and legally, it’s a quadricycle.

You probably already know the difference between the two; it’s all about size.

But you’re still wasting all of that space.

And if I was given the choice of a ride on the back of a bike, or a trip in one of those, I’d probably take the bike (so long as it’s not the middle of the Gauteng winter).

What I find really fascinating about this is that, first, it’s following trends elsewhere.

When I went to Rwanda in 2017, there were motorbikes carrying passengers everywhere. And the service obviously worked; it was quick and cheap. I’m sure the same thing happens in many other countries.

But the second thing is how much disruption has occurred in our transport market in just the past 11 years or so. And how much of that has to do with Uber.

Before Uber came to South Africa, the car-taxi industry hadn’t really changed in about 50 years. Maybe even longer.

Taxis were something you saw outside airports and train stations. You knew nothing about the drive and very little about the car.

When Uber came, that way of life was not going to last. And those drivers knew it!

They used violence to try to force Uber drivers out. 

Even quite recently, when I used the Gautrain to Pretoria, Uber drivers refused to come to the station because of the taxi men hanging around there.

Last week at Cape Town International Airport, I saw people hanging around shouting “taxi”. Compared with Uber, where you know so much about the driver, and know the car will be reliable, who would use these taxis?

But if no one uses them, why are they still hanging around there? 

The real point though is how quickly this disruption has happened.

Virtually no change for 50 years, then suddenly a whole revolution in transport.

And it hasn’t ended yet; there will be more disruption to come.

It’s a really good example of how a whole series of technologies around our phones, GPS, credit card payments and many other things have come together to make a real change in the way in which we move around.

But it also reminds us of how new technologies work. They start as something cool and fun for the rich, and often end up as a necessity for the middle classes, sometimes even for those who have very little.

Because of the nature of innovation involving information (think X, Facebook, and video and music streaming), often these services are available in a very democratic way when they start. In the past, most new innovations were only for the rich and stayed like that for a long time.

No longer. Now you can make a lot more money providing services to everyone.

Of course, there are always people who lose out. I fear there will be some attacks on people who drive these bikes. It seems to me almost inevitable that this will happen.

I also hope and pray that when these drivers are carrying someone behind them, they find a way to both watch the map on the phone and keep their full attention on the road ahead. DM

Comments (9)

Robbed Blind Jun 3, 2025, 06:55 PM

I don’t have as much of a problem with the bikes. They can be slow or careless but overall I think they reduce traffic because that’s one less car or van making a trip. In my opinion, the far greater blight is Ubers double parking to wait for their “riders”. Sometimes they will block both directions of traffic, and you can’t get past at all. Or they block a parking space by double parking in front of it. It’s a huge problem in Cape Town.

Andrew Mckenzie Jun 3, 2025, 10:52 AM

Well - fortune favours the brave! I've ridden motorcycles most of my life - and survived in one piece! However I'm not sure about jumping on the back of what would likely be a low power commuter type bike with an unknown pilot riding with or through traffic not known for wonderfully good road manners. Then think taxi behaviour...

Henri Laurie Jun 3, 2025, 10:10 AM

There are ride-share services that simply link up individuals (France has one that I have seen in action). Bit like dating sites really. They don't make as much money as Uber, of course, which is why Uber appeals to mainstream journalism.

Henri Laurie Jun 3, 2025, 10:09 AM

And by the way, Uber is proud of avoid regulation and passing all the risks to the drivers and owners. There is maybe a revolution to be had in linking customers more directly to providers. But Uber is not it.

Henri Laurie Jun 3, 2025, 10:04 AM

I agree with the comments calling for public transport to be resurrected. Stephen Grootes, with all due respect, that you can write an article about transport in the last 50 years and not decry the destruction of public transport (both here and abroad) is unforgivable. You really undercut your credibility. And in places where it wasn't destroyed, public transport is still very popular, effective and an immense boon to the local economy.

Rae Earl Jun 3, 2025, 09:01 AM

When I arrived in JHB in 1961 it had a faultless bus and rail system servicing the CBD, suburbs, E & W Rand, Pretoria and the Vaal Triangle, all affordable and all always reliable and on time. Progress into modern times has destroyed it all. Taxis rule fearlessly and with a middle finger to the law and their passengers. As an old motorcyclist Stephen, I would hop onto the back of a bike in an advanced state of trepidation and terror. I'm retired and stay at home. May the Lord be praised...

William Dryden Jun 3, 2025, 10:43 AM

I couldn't have put it better Rae, Stephen didn't want to say what you have said, which is a shame.

The Proven Jun 3, 2025, 08:58 AM

I do think the next revolution is also happening - what if I don't have a car? Living in Europe I travel with a bicycle and use public transport (all of it free) to go everywhere. The dedicated bicycle roads are used extensively and preferred. When I do need a car, I call an Uber and don't mind the cost - its still a fraction of the cost of owning a vehicle. A motor vehicle is the most expensive cost for a private citizen (more than a house) - go work it out and then get rid of it.

ashton Jun 3, 2025, 08:36 AM

We do live in a truly strange world when I find myself supporting something that the EFF is doing.

A Rosebank Ratepayer Jun 2, 2025, 10:14 PM

The book Factfulness identifies four hierarchical levels of living. Wrt to transport;…1st walking and animal traction, 2nd bicycles, 3rd motorcycles, 4th cars. Public transport cuts thru these levels depending on means and organisation in a country. Moz has largely got to bicycles, particularly in the north. East and West Africa; motor cycles. SA’s development appears so fractured and uneven we have mainky levels 1 and 4, often in every township.