ANC’s greater reliance on voice of communities in upcoming elections adds new dynamic to complex space

It now appears the party is going to allow communities to nominate people who would then become ANC members, before becoming ANC candidates within their wards. 

This suggests that the party is very concerned about losing some wards simply because the local ANC on the ground is deeply unpopular. It also shows that the party itself is losing political power in important ways, while communities may be gaining power in a process around the possible deepening of democracy.

But there are still dangers which lurk here, as direct democracy can result in some negative influences gaining ground in our politics.

On Sunday the Sunday Times published a story explaining how the ANC’s candidate selection guidelines suggest that communities should have the final say in deciding who would be the party’s candidate for the position of ward councillor. It reported that communities would even “have the right to veto branch decisions”.

This is part of a major change to how the ANC is managing the candidate selection process. 

For years, its top leadership has publicly bemoaned the way that councillors behave. In 2011, a decade ago, then secretary-general Gwede Mantashe said councillors needed to have more public meetings, and for years the party has tried to demand that councillors live with their communities, but to no avail.

Now, former President Kgalema Motlanthe will play a big role in the selection process, as Chair of the ANC’s new Election Commission, a commission which may well reduce the amount of power the office of the secretary-general would normally have. 

All of this is a clear indication of how worried the ANC is about these elections. It also suggests that the party is finally acting on what has been a fact for many years, that the party’s councillors do not live within the communities they represent.

In 2014, for example, during by-elections in Tlokwe (which featured ANC candidates against independent candidates who used to be ANC councillors), this reporter was told by an ANC spokesperson that the party’s candidates would not do radio interviews. The candidates would not answer questions or do any interviews at all through the entire election campaign. All questions were to be directed to him, the party’s spokesperson, deployed by Luthuli House.

Now, the situation has changed dramatically. The party is seeking candidates from the community itself.

The difficulties with selecting ward candidates for the party cannot be underestimated. 

In 2016 then secretary-general Gwede Mantashe said that submitting lists of candidates was “like being responsible for a nuclear bomb”. It is well known that people die in the fight to be a councillor and hitmen are used to kill opposing candidates.

This all happens within the same political party.

Thus the introduction of this change, allowing communities to play a greater role, perhaps the final role, may introduce much more complication into an already fraught process. And there will be a huge sense of urgency as well, as the elections are currently scheduled for the end of October. This means there has to be a lot of consultation (possibly involving public meetings during a third wave of Covid-19) in a short period of time.

Also, as the political analyst Dr Ralph Mathekga has pointed out, it is likely that the local ANC branch will want to nominate their own candidate. They would resist the imposition of someone else, particularly if there is a difficult political history between their candidate and the “community candidate”.

Mantashe’s “nuclear bomb” will perhaps become easier to set off.

However this is also part of a much more important process.

While it is almost trite to say the ANC is losing political power, on the other side of the equation, communities are gaining political power.

This is vitally important. It may be part of a process of deepening democracy, a continuation of a process which has seen the ANC at the centre losing power consistently since 1994. This was always going to happen; one election does not make a society, rather it takes many years to embed practices and conventions, and for power to move from the centre to the provinces and the regions, and the cities. 

What would happen, for example, if the community of a particular place wanted a candidate to represent them who was racist, or sexist, or xenophobic, or espoused homophobia. It would surely be against what the ANC stands for to have such a candidate, but may present a dilemma.