Blood on the tar: The challenge of ending collective violence in SA’s minibus taxi industry

In the centre of South Africa’s urban transport system, the minibus taxi industry stands as both a lifeline and a battleground. Every day, millions of commuters rely on these vehicles to navigate cities where formal public transport is often unreliable or absent.

Yet, beneath the hum of engines and the chatter of passengers lies a darker reality — one marked by violence, territorial disputes, and a cycle of retribution that seems unbreakable.

The minibus taxi industry, a R50-billion-a-year sector, is a microcosm of South Africa’s broader struggles with collective violence, where the lines between economic survival, criminality, and state failure blur into what philosophers might term an aporia — an irresolvable contradiction.

This piece examines the structural, economic, and sociopolitical dimensions of violence in South Africa’s minibus taxi industry. It explores how historical neglect, weak state regulation, and fierce competition for routes have entrenched a system where bloodshed is normalised. The discussion also considers potential solutions, questioning whether formalisation, state intervention, or grassroots mediation can break the cycle of violence.

Read more: How the Gauteng government’s decision to disregard Soweto taxi agreement led to the latest standoff

The minibus taxi industry emerged in the 1970s and 1980s as an informal response to apartheid-era neglect. Under apartheid, black South Africans were systematically excluded from reliable public transport. Trains and buses were either unavailable or racially segregated, leaving millions with no viable means of commuting to work.

The minibus taxi filled this void, operating as a grassroots solution to state-imposed exclusion. Initially, the industry was fragmented, with individual operators servicing local routes. However, as demand grew, taxi associations formed to regulate operations, allocate routes, and negotiate with authorities.

These associations became powerful entities, wielding significant influence over urban mobility. Yet, their rise was accompanied by increasing violence as rival groups competed for dominance over lucrative routes.

Post apartheid, the government attempted to integrate the taxi industry into the formal transport economy. The 1996 Taxi Recapitalisation Programme aimed to replace old, unsafe vehicles, reduce violence, and introduce regulation. However, corruption, mismanagement, and resistance from taxi bosses rendered the programme ineffective.

Decades later, the industry remains largely informal, volatile, and resistant to state control.

Read more: We need to have an elevated discussion about the taxi industry

Violence in the taxi industry is not arbitrary — it is a calculated strategy for economic survival. At the heart of the conflict is route dominance, where control over high-demand routes translates into substantial profits. Taxi associations operate as quasi-governments, enforcing their authority through intimidation, arson, and assassination.

The most profitable routes — typically those connecting townships to city centres — are fiercely contested. Associations employ “queue marshals” to control taxi ranks, often using force to exclude competitors. Disputes over territory frequently escalate into taxi wars, with rival factions engaging in shootouts, vehicle burnings, and targeted killings.

The South African government has struggled to impose order on the industry. Police interventions are often ineffective, either due to under-resourcing, corruption, or fear of retaliation. In some cases, law enforcement officers have been accused of colluding with taxi bosses, further undermining public trust.

Vigilante enforcement

Breaking the cycle of violence