Civil society slams Gender Commission over ‘inadequate’ public participation in commissioner candidates selection

More than 40 organisations have come out against the “inadequate” public participation process for selecting new commissioners for the Commission for Gender Equality (CGE).

The organisations say the public is being denied the opportunity to meaningfully consider the suitability of the shortlisted candidates.

On 27 June, the Portfolio Committee on Women, Youth and Persons with Disabilities invited the public to apply for and nominate suitable candidates to serve on the CGE as commissioners. Applications closed on 18 July. The Committee met on 23 and 24 August to assess and shortlist candidates.

Last Friday, the chairperson of the portfolio committee Nonhlanhla Ncube-Ndaba announced the 24 shortlisted candidates and invited the public to comment.

She said the closing date for comment is 16 September.

In a joint letter addressed to the chair, the Speaker of the National Assembly, and the Office on Institutions Supporting Democracy, civil society groups said the ten-day timeframe for public comment “falls short of an appropriate and meaningful public participation process”.

“This time allocation is entirely inadequate for fact-finding, discussion, and consideration by civil society, and sends the very unfortunate message that the appointment of CGE commissioners does not warrant careful consideration or proper background research,” the organisations said.

“Organisations will not be able to canvas their constituents and build consensus in such a short time, which will impact very negatively on the awareness and participation of many marginalised groups.”

The groups raised concern about the “heavy emphasis” on the qualifications of the candidates, as this might disadvantage community candidates who may have an extensive history of commitment to gender equality but with few or no formal qualifications.

“The spreadsheet provided also makes it impossible to assess whether the shortlisted candidates have such a record, as there is no description of their work or activism in this context, or even their own motivation for applying,” the organisations said.