Dailymaverick logo

Politics

This article is more than a year old

Politics

EFF’s Marshall Dlamini sentenced for assaulting constable in Parliament - he remains an MP

Marshall Dlamini has been given an 18-month suspended sentence after hitting a constable in the face and breaking his glasses following the 2019 Sona event in parliament.  He remains an MP, as his sentence was suspended. The EFF has stuck by its SG, saying he had rightfully perceived a threat for the safety of EFF members. 
EFF’s Marshall Dlamini sentenced for assaulting constable in Parliament - he remains an MP The EFF’s Marshall Dlamini (left) and party leader Julius Malema at the Equality Court on 16 February 2022 in Johannesburg. (Photo: Gallo Images / Fani Mahuntsi)

EFF Secretary-General Marshall Dlamini has been handed an 18-month prison sentence, suspended for five years, for assaulting a policeman during a chaotic altercation in Parliament in 2019. Additionally, the Cape Town Magistrates’ Court imposed a fine of R6,000 or an alternative of three months in jail.

Dlamini was found guilty of assault with intent to cause grievous bodily harm and malicious damage to property after hitting Constable Johan Carstens in the face and breaking his glasses. The incident occurred in the lobby of Parliament following the 2019 State of the Nation Address (Sona). Carstens suffered a 3cm cut on the bridge of his nose and facial redness from the assault.

Read more in Daily Maverick: SA’s GNU Cabinet negotiations are intertwined with Ramaphosa succession battle within the ANC

The altercation took place on 7 February 2019 after a heated Sona event. Dlamini, along with other EFF members, claimed they acted out of a perceived threat to the safety of their leader, Julius Malema. Dlamini testified that he believed Malema was under threat of assassination, which prompted his actions. However, Magistrate Nasha Banwari rejected this defence, stating that there was no credible evidence to substantiate such a threat.

Marshall Dlamini The EFF’s Marshall Dlamini (left) and party leader Julius Malema at the Equality Court on 16 February 2022 in Johannesburg. (Photo: Gallo Images / Fani Mahuntsi)


Court’s judgment


In her judgment, Magistrate Banwari emphasised the severity of Dlamini’s actions and their impact on public order and the dignity of law enforcement. While acknowledging Dlamini’s role and responsibilities within the EFF, the court noted that the assault could not be justified by any perceived threat.

 



However, given his lack of prior convictions and his expressed remorse, the court found that a suspended sentence was appropriate.

Following the sentencing, EFF spokesperson Leigh-Ann Mathys expressed the party’s continued support for Dlamini. She argued that the incident arose from a genuine concern for the safety of EFF leaders.

“Marshall Dlamini acted out of what he rightfully perceived as an imminent threat to our collective safety,” Mathys stated. “The court rightly dismissed the politically motivated argument by the State, which sought to imprison a responsible member of society who was executing his responsibility of defending his leadership,” said Mathys.

Mathys also praised the court for recognising Dlamini’s contributions and qualifications, stating that removing him from his role would serve no constructive purpose. She reiterated the EFF’s stance that there was a concerted effort to prevent their leaders from fulfilling their duties during Sona 2019.

Impact on parliamentary status


Dlamini’s suspended sentence means he retains his Parliamentary seat. According to Section 47(1)(e) of the Constitution, an MP is disqualified if convicted and sentenced to 12 months or more in prison without the option of a fine. As Dlamini’s sentence is suspended, he does not face immediate disqualification.

Had the sentence not been suspended, Dlamini would have been removed from Parliament, and the EFF’s next highest-ranking member on their list would have taken his place. DM

Comments (8)

Newills Jun 30, 2024, 03:13 PM

Seems as if the culture of violence will be with EFF for a very long time before they hopefully learn to adopt a culture of maturity and sensible effective debate

Chris.Botha Jul 4, 2024, 11:32 AM

The voters have spoken. These clowns lost support as the latest election results indicated. Malema seem to realize that acting like spoiled children not getting their way, is not good for politics. Now he claims he would suit-up and become and adult in Parlaiment. As it goes against the very nature of who and what the EFF is, I seriously doubt any suit would contain the primeval character of the circus they orchestrate…

visseredward28 Jun 30, 2024, 10:20 AM

He just took a liberty potshots, No threat to Anybody's live!

nicholasandrewmiles Jun 29, 2024, 03:02 PM

was he found quilty of assault? yes. in a court, by a judge, after looking at evidence, etc etc? yes. what else matters? suspension doesn't matter, imo. did he do it? was he found guilty? was a punishment determined? so what if it's suspended? suspended doesn't mean eradicated, or erased, or wiped clean, it means you did it, and this is the sentence.

David van der Want Jun 29, 2024, 08:43 AM

Blackadder : criminal record? Baldrick : absolutely not!! Blackadder : oh come on Baldrick. You're going to be an MP for heaven's sake. I'll just put fraud and sexual deviancy R. Atkinson. Circa mid 80's

Dennis Bailey Jun 29, 2024, 08:23 AM

5 years to get a sentence. There is something very corrupt with our courts. About time courts had cost orders against such consistent delinquency. The EFF crook is simply that and will enjoy a further season of taxpayer’s salary provision while continuing to show j-public the middle finger. Some call it democracy others call it aNGU. I call a total f#@k up.

peddledavid7 Jun 28, 2024, 11:29 PM

So hitting a policeman carrying out his lawful duties to prevent violent activities warrants a suspended sentence? This magistrate requires to be reviewed urgently!

Middle aged Mike Jun 28, 2024, 06:20 PM

Banana republic is as banana republic does.

deon50 Jun 28, 2024, 05:42 PM

Taking a potshot, totally unprovoked, at someone probably two decades his senior - just for doing his job. And then they have the gall to claim perceived endangerment. What a spineless, lying coward.