Dailymaverick logo

Africa

Africa, Business Maverick, South Africa, Our Burning Planet

Fate of vexed East African pipeline project may hinge on looming decision by China’s Exim Bank

Fate of vexed East African pipeline project may hinge on looming decision by China’s Exim Bank
An oil drilling rig in the Ngiri 3 well pad at the Tilenga project, operated by TotalEnergies EP Uganda, part of the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP), in Buliisa, Uganda, on Wednesday, Oct. 25, 2023. The $4 billion EACOP infrastructure will transport 16,000 barrels of oil a day from Western Uganda to Tanzania's Tanga port on the Indian Ocean coast. Photographer: Luke Dray/Bloomberg via Getty Images
A possible make-or-break decision is looming for the controversial East African Crude Oil Pipeline, a project Uganda says is crucial to its development but which has stirred fierce opposition from environmentalists and human rights activists.

Ugandan Energy Minister Ruth Ssentamu told Daily Maverick during an interview at the Africa Oil Week Investing in African Energy conference in Cape Town that China’s Exim Bank was expected to make a decision by December on providing finance for the project. 

The saga is emblematic of Uganda’s long slog to become an oil producer in an age when the shifting tides of the global economy are turning against fossil fuels. 

The East African Crude Oil Pipeline will run 1,443km — which would make it the largest heated pipeline in the world — from land-locked Uganda to the Tanga Port in Tanzania. About 80% of the pipeline will snake through Tanzania to transport about 250,000 barrels of oil per day — a drop in the almost 83 million barrels-per-day bucket produced worldwide in 2023. 

Critics contend it will threaten waterways and wildlife, has already displaced tens of thousands of people without compensation, and goes against the grain of the worldwide decarbonisation drive to douse the flames of climate change linked to fossil fuel usage.  

Uganda maintains that as a poor, developing nation it needs to use its natural endowment to cleave a path to industrialisation, and that environmental and social concerns are overblown.

Such concerns have stymied efforts to fund the pipeline. 

“We had planned to fund it with 40% equity and 60% debt. But as we faced challenges the shareholders decided to relook at the equity. And as I speak now equity has surpassed debt,” Ssentamu told Daily Maverick.

The East African Crude Oil Pipeline’s shareholders are the Uganda National Oil Company, TotalEnergies E&P Uganda, China’s CNOOC and the Tanzania Petroleum Development Corporation.

The project is estimated to cost about $5-billion (about R88-billion), so well over $2-billion needs to be financed with debt. 

This is where China’s Export-Import Bank, known as Exim Bank, comes into play. 

“The Exim Bank has promised us that by December they will finalise the FID (Final Investment Decision). We need that final debt tranche because we have exhausted our equity,” Ssentamu said. 

If that did not come through, Ssentamu said there were still other options on the table, including 11 European banks. 

But she pointedly noted that “China has a keen interest in this project”. 

“One of the developers is a Chinese company. The pipes for the pipeline are manufactured in China. The company that is laying the pipes is a Chinese company. And the port where the pipeline ends is going to be constructed by a Chinese company,” she said. 

One advantage to finance from the Exim Bank is that it typically comes at lower than standard market interest rates. 

But is it in the game? It’s not been in a rush to make its decision despite the Chinese commercial interests involved amid concerns about the project’s economic viability. 

It’s also interesting to note that South Africa’s Standard Bank remains a potential source of finance, which may be a reflection of the fact that its biggest shareholder is the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China. 

East African Crude Oil Pipeline An oil drilling rig in the Ngiri 3 well pad at the Tilenga project, operated by TotalEnergies EP Uganda, part of the East African Crude Oil Pipeline, Buliisa, Uganda, 25 October 2023. (Photo: Luke Dray / Bloomberg via Getty Images)


Environmental and human rights concerns


Banks have mostly been treating the project as if it was toxic. The European Parliament in 2022 passed an emergency resolution opposing it — a red flag for potential European lenders. 

“... the construction and operational phases are expected to cause further serious adverse impacts for communities within the oil extraction and pipeline areas, including jeopardising water resources,” read the resolution, which is not binding on Total. 

Read more: Joint motion for a resolution on violations of human rights in Uganda and Tanzania linked to investments in fossil fuels projects

Ssentamu said such concerns were the alarmist work of “climate change activists”. 

“The pipeline will be buried and insulated so the heat will not be felt,” she told Daily Maverick. “After construction, you can use the area again.” 

The CO₂ emissions linked to the project are among the issues raised by activists opposed to it. 

On this front, the estimates are that the CO2 emissions per barrel of oil produced in Uganda will be in the range of 20-45kg of CO2e, well below the global average of 70-100. 

In her presentation to the Africa Oil Week conference, Ssentamu dismissed reports that the pipeline would run directly through Lake Victoria and cross 230 rivers. 

Still, where there is smoke, there is fire. 

Opponents of the project have been arbitrarily arrested, and activists claim that tens of thousands of people have been displaced. 

And the project — like any large infrastructure build — is bound to have an environmental impact, and any perceived threat to African wildlife stirs emotions in the West. 

“... the pipeline will disturb nearly 2,000 square kilometres of protected wildlife habitats, including the gorgeous Murchison Falls National Park, the Taala Forest Reserve, the Bugoma Forest, and the Biharamulo Game Reserve – these are multiple reserves critical to the preservation of vulnerable species such as the eastern chimpanzee and African elephant”, says the International Rights of Nature Tribunal. 

Read more: EACOP (East African Crude Oil) Pipeline

According to the East African Crude Oil Pipeline website, the section of the Taala Reserve the pipeline will go through “... is used mainly for eucalyptus forestry”. 

Read more: East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) Ltd. partners with National Forestry Authority (NFA) for the conservation of biodiversity

An analysis by conservation NGO the World Wildlife Fund found that 510km of elephant habitat would be affected. 

Read more: Preliminary threat analysis (PTA) of the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP)

Oil was first discovered in Uganda in 2006 but production has long been delayed — it is now seen as commencing next year — as the government insisted that a refinery be built first, as well as the pipeline.  

The Ugandan government’s narrative is that its economic development plans are being sabotaged by  greens from countries whose affluence is a product of fossil fuels. 

The counter to that would be that President Yoweri Museveni is a fossilised political relic who has used an iron fist to retain power while trampling on gay and other rights, and whose obsession with oil does not reflect current global economic realities. 

It remains to be seen if the pipeline becomes a pipe dream. Regardless, the project casts a revealing light on contemporary development debates. DM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REeWvTRUpMk

This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R35.