Dailymaverick logo

DM168

DM168

It’s all fake – nano-influencers and their paid campaigns to stroke political egos

Social media influencers are taking over South Africa’s online political discourse – and Daily Maverick investigations have found that money appears to be changing hands.
It’s all fake – nano-influencers and their paid campaigns to stroke political egos

Daily Maverick has identified at least five different political campaigns running on X in April seemingly being driven by people paid to post.

When Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana announced on 24 April that the VAT hike was being scrapped, almost all political parties scrambled to take credit. Although it seemed clear that the DA and EFF’s court action was really the death-knell for the tax increase, in the days that followed you might never have guessed that from social media.

X was flooded with posts thanking ActionSA for having stopped the VAT increase. “Now VAT increase remains suspended and this wouldn’t be possible without ActionSA!” one crowed.

Of course, some of those posting would have been legitimate ActionSA voters expressing appreciation for their party. But when Daily Maverick took a closer look at the tweeting, certain features emerged – in particular, a relatively small number of accounts relentlessly tweeting on one subject on a certain day and interacting with each other’s tweets on the same topic to amplify them. These are the telltale signs of an orchestrated campaign.

One of the accounts we studied, @Hlumelomdiza, posted about ActionSA stopping the VAT hike no fewer than 125 times between 24 and 26 April. 

ActionSA denies using these “nano-influencers” to tweet. Yet one online gun-for-hire contacted by Daily Maverick pointed to his ActionSA tweets as an example of the paid work he has undertaken in the past.

Digital consultancy Murmur Intelligence has been tracking the rise of paid-for political discourse on South African social media for some time. Researchers Kyle Findlay, Tabelo Timse and Aldu Cornelissen have written previously that the concern is that many users will not realise these posts are not organic expressions of political solidarity.

Read more: Influence-for-hire trend is distorting public discourse, poses threat to foundations of democracy

“These users trust the content the influencers share, unaware that much of it is part of carefully crafted, paid campaigns,” they wrote. “Behind the scenes, political parties and interest groups invest millions to manipulate public discourse, distorting the democratic process and shaping voter perceptions with endorsements that are anything but authentic.”

The researchers have found that a client like a political party typically approaches an agency with a particular message to be spread. The agency then briefs “mega-influencers” (with more than a million followers), who then delegate the task to their own network of “nano-influencers” (with less than 1,000 followers) or “micro-influencers” (1,000-99,999 followers).

These small-scale influencers are then paid small amounts of money for their tweeting, often by e-wallet. Findlay told Daily Maverick this week that Murmur has found that nano-­influencers are generally paid between R50 and R250 for their “engagement tasks”, with micro-influencers able to take home a few thousand rand.

A number of those accounts seemingly participating in the ActionSA VAT campaign openly advertise their availability for “promotions” in their bios. Daily Maverick contacted a number of them without success –until we posed as a client in need of services.

A micro-influencer with 19,500 followers, who has not given permission to be named, was quick to respond to an email inquiry about rates for a potential political campaign on social media.

“I have a team for you so that [we] can pull this together and we engage with each other’s tweets to get those numbers,” he said.

For R5,000, he promised us “20 influencers with more than 10k followers”, with a more specific fee dependent on whether we wanted “a trend [a topic on X’s trending list] or awareness”.

Asked if he would have to disclose anywhere in his tweets that they were paid for, he replied: “Only influencers know [it’s] a paid gig not everyone knows what’s really going on [on] X”.

As evidence of the kind of campaigns in which he has participated in the past, he sent us tweets from a number of different accounts – all controlled by him.

“So if Godongwana is really withdrawing from that VAT rates it means ActionSA was really right,” one read.

“Now VAT increase remains suspended and this wouldn’t be possible without ActionSA,” read another.

ActionSA spokesperson Matthew George told Daily Maverick this week: “ActionSA does not employ paid influencers,” adding it simply pays to boost ads on social media.

“As part of our broader digital communications platform, we do allocate resources towards social media advertising to enhance the reach and visibility of our message.”

Asked whether it was possible that the social media agencies the party works with could be employing paid influencers to spread a pro-­ActionSA message, George did not respond.

ActionSA’s denials are not surprising: no political party, it seems, is willing to admit it uses these tactics. Indeed, the denials go all the way down the chain.

Read more: Unseen foot soldiers — how naïve nano influencers boost paid political campaigns

Daily Maverick’s micro-influencer told us that he gets these gigs through working with four social media agencies. Contacted for comment, three agencies denied ever doing political work; the fourth did not respond.

But it is clear that ActionSA’s is not the only game in town. Daily Maverick found suggestions of at least four other paid-for local political campaigns on X in April alone. 

Pro-Mashatile campaign

Deputy Presi­dent Paul Ma­­sha­­tile “soft launched” his campaign to be ANC president on Tuesday, 22 April, at a commemorative Soweto gathering to honour uMkhonto weSizwe combatants. Attending the event, News24 reported, were people carrying banners reading “Mashatile iThemba Lethu” (Mashatile our hope).

“Although Mashatile denied campaigning,” News24 wrote, “#MashatileIthemba­Lethu was trending on X [that] afternoon”.

Daily Maverick asked Findlay and Murmur to take a look at the hashtag this week.

Murmur’s analysis revealed a “single network of paid influencers – or ‘buzzers’ (i.e., users single-mindedly focused on reposting specific users to a far greater extent than would normally be expected)” who likely worked on the Mashatile campaign.

ANC culture frowns upon early overt campaigning for the leadership. Mashatile’s spokesperson, Keith Khoza, told Daily Maverick: “The DP [deputy president] was never involved in any campaign and therefore did not need to engage influencers.”

Yet the Mashatile online campaign was not subtle. Daily Maverick identified at least 15 accounts tweeting repeatedly in support of Mashatile only on 22 April. One, @arena_maz, tweeted at least 59 times about Mashatile on that day.

Other campaigns for ANC politicians


Here’s where things started to get interesting. When Daily Maverick analysed the accounts of those users tweeting in bulk about the virtues of Paul Mashatile, it soon became clear that he was not the only politician they were hyping up.

The accounts tweeting about Mashatile on 22 April, almost invariably, were also tweeting repeatedly about the activities of three other ANC politicians in particular: Limpopo provincial secretary Reuben Ma­dadzhe, Limpopo MEC Tony Rachoene and ANC Youth League leader Collen Malatji.

The nature of the posts seems clearly inauthentic. “Between the scenes of Limpopo’s growing political cohesion is a humble but firm force. He doesn’t need the spotlight, but his impact is unmistakable. #ReubenMadadzhe,” wrote @ThembaOnX, an account that also tweets in support of Mashatile, Rachoene and Malatji.

“Public infrastructure can’t be planned in isolation. I think that’s why MEC for @LDPWRI Tony Rachoene launched #Stakeholder­Tuesdays; to align government plans with community priorities and get everyone working together. #TonyRachoene,” wrote @Kim_wa_mzansi, who also tweets about the same three other politicians.

Madadzhe, Rachoene and Malatji have all been embroiled in allegations of corruption or misgovernance over the past year.

CapricornFM reported that the EFF opened a case against Madadzhe related to how he had obtained his BMW X5. City Press cited sources who accused Rachoene of having purged the board of the Road Agency Limpopo to install his own people, and the newspaper had sight of a lawyer’s letter demanding payment for an R870,000 hotel and restaurant bill that Malatji’s ANC Youth League had skipped out on.

Read more: The powerful hidden hand of anonymous paid influencers who lack accountability and transparency

ANC spokesperson Mahlengi Bhengu did not respond to Daily Maverick’s questions this week as to whether the social media campaigns around Madadzhe, Rachoene and Malatji were organised through the party.

Daily Maverick identified another hashtag in recent weeks, “BudgetForThePeople”, that also shows signs of being an inauthentic campaign. The hashtag was used by what appeared to be nano-influencers in support of the ANC’s actions around the Budget.

Murmur’s Findlay said there were indications that a similar set of “buzzers” were used to amplify support for Paul Mashatile and support for the ANC’s Budget process.

Embattled RAF CEO also being hyped in online campaign


Daily Maverick’s micro-influencer said one of the other campaigns he had been paid to tweet in support of was in defence of Road Accident Fund (RAF) CEO Collins Letsaolo, who is under investigation by the Special Investigating Unit after allegedly violating procurement processes to secure a R79-million lease for the fund in Johannesburg.

Read more: RAF CEO Collins Letsoalo hits back at media criticism, allegations of malfeasance

The micro-influencer linked to tweets he posted using the hashtag “#DefendCollinsLetsoalo”. Daily Maverick also found evidence of a network flooding X with the hashtag on 29 April.

A typical tweet: “RAF lawyers hate Collins Letsoalo because he implemented the ‘Drive Your Claim Forward’ campaign launched to address a backlog of 321,000 claims. This initiative encourages claimants to submit outstanding docs aiming to expedite claims. #DefendCollinsLetsoalo”

The Auditor-General might well take a dim view of the RAF as a state agency using public funds to run a social media PR campaign for its CEO. But the RAF insists it’s got nothing to do with it. “The RAF is not paying anyone to tweet on X in support of Collins Letsaolo,” spokesperson McIntosh Polela told Daily Maverick. “The fund has absolutely no reason to do so.” DM

This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R35.

Front page 2 May

Comments (8)

Patterson Alan John May 6, 2025, 06:02 AM

World-wide research shows that people now believe social media posts above mainline newspapers and suchlike. Immersed in their personal contacts, people have moved to trusting whatever they read, without any desire to check for facts - too hard. The quick 20 second reads are absorbed as the truth. And this reaches the masses. Do you know of any young person without a mobile phone? They live for the quick fix of a new story, or thread. The world will be changed by unchecked social media.

Gazeley Walker May 5, 2025, 03:38 PM

Why am I not surprised that Paul Mashitile's name is linked to this practice?

Herman van der Merwe May 4, 2025, 04:39 PM

This makes totally sense - Its easy to activate interest by repeating a name many times. Rebecca well done and please go on with your work.

megapode May 4, 2025, 02:30 PM

I think we need to not be too blasé about this. Look at the role that social media played in the UK last year. Folks are getting disenchanted with establishment politicians & media and so look for other voices. These influencers exist precisely because SM has reach. What we also see all over the world is authorities taking a greater interest in SM, what folks post there and holding them accountable. The conversations, after all, are not private - they are global and public.

Richard Bryant May 4, 2025, 01:35 PM

He will take the zuma leaning faction of the ANC and join MK. And so we will end up with one large Zulu faction with its concentration in KZN and parts of Gauteng. And a massive power struggle between Mashatile and the goon ordained by the bitter zuma. The ANC will be left with its power base in the Eastern Cape under the corrupt Mabuyane and his fake degree. Everywhere else, it will be relegated to the meaningless remainder like in the Western Cape.

Rae Earl May 4, 2025, 11:20 AM

Good investigative work Rebecca. Paul Mashatile is emerging as a dangerous extension of the ANC. That party has now effectively wrecked SA's economy in the past 15 years or so and if Mashatile takes over from lame-duck Ramaphosa, we're in for rapid decline to failed state. Mashatile has, for years, been flaunting his urge to get rich at tax payer's expense through corruption and his association with questionable people with lots of money. Another Jacob Zuma in the making.

D'Esprit Dan May 4, 2025, 09:25 AM

Anybody believing anything in support of any politician on any social media shouldn't be allowed to vote! Actually, anybody believing anything any 'influencer' posts should be barred from public discourse!

Fanie Rajesh Ngabiso May 3, 2025, 06:17 PM

Regulation is needed to make people personally liable for what they post - or the platform allowing held liable so they then sue the poster. This could nd should be part of their terms and conditions of using the platform.

Johan Herholdt May 5, 2025, 10:43 AM

I agree. This is in the common interest of all South Africans. There is enough useful and well-researched legislation (and attendent regulations) emerging from all over the world for a panel of experts to craft something useful for South Africa. We have to do this soon before more politicians get onto the bandwagon. Should also battle other false claims (products, medicines, conspiracy theories, etc)