Dailymaverick logo

South Africa

South Africa, Maverick News

Magistrate in ‘Pastor’ Mboro case refuses to recuse herself

Magistrate in ‘Pastor’ Mboro case refuses to recuse herself
The State’s recusal application was based on claims that the magistrate was biased. It contended that she had made biased remarks at a previous hearing when she suggested that the prosecution was too harsh on Mboro and his co-accused.

The magistrate presiding over Pastor Paseka “Mboro” Motsoeneng’s bail application on Wednesday dismissed the State’s bid for her to recuse herself over allegations of bias.

“There is no basis, no merit to the submission as it is evident that the State witness sought to report or cook a narrative that is an apprehension of bias on the side of the court,” ruled magistrate Katlego Mokoena in the Palm Ridge Magistrates’ Court.

“The State witness’s failure to approach me or his seniors questions his motives… It is clear that the State’s apprehension is not reasonable, objective, and not based on correct facts, which casts doubt on the integrity, credibility and judicial impairment of the court. 

“This court will not allow the State witness to distort what transpired and what did not transpire to formulate an ill-considered narrative. There is no basis for the court to make such a comment.”

Read more: Pastor Mboro’s bail hearing delayed amid application to have magistrate recused

The State’s recusal application was based on claims that Mokoena was biased. It contended that she had made biased remarks at a previous hearing when she suggested that the prosecution had been too harsh on Mboro and his co-accused.

The State’s complaints included that Mokoena invited the defence team to her chambers without the State present and allegedly advised them to “go and fix” Mboro and his co-accused’s poorly constructed affidavits.

The State also accused Mokoena of making inappropriate comments about the prosecutor’s harshness and enrolling the case without the necessary documentation. The State argued that these issues put Mokoena’s conduct into question and necessitated her recusal to ensure fairness and avoid bias.

The case against Mboro stems from a widely circulated video showing Mboro, his bodyguard and his son causing chaos at Matsediso Primary School in Katlehong, Gauteng. The video depicted the group wielding pangas, pointing firearms at school staff and allegedly abducting two children thought to be relatives of Mboro.

The incident is believed to be linked to an ongoing custody dispute involving the children.

Further delays


With the recusal matter resolved, Mboro and his bodyguard Clement Baloyi’s bail application encountered further delays.

It was their second attempt at securing bail after their first application was rejected in August. Mboro’s son was granted bail at this application.

Read more: Pastor Mboro’s latest bail bid postponed as controversial ‘prophet’ claims victimisation in custody

On Wednesday, the defence, led by advocate Phillip Dlamini, challenged the application of Schedule 5 offences to the charges, which set a higher bar for being granted bail.

Dlamini argued that the prosecution had not provided a certificate for these serious charges and claimed a rifle that had been taken to the school was a replica.

He contended that his clients should instead be charged under Schedule 1, the least serious types of offences, asserting that it was “unfair” for them to remain in custody.

The prosecutor, Peelo Vilakazi, countered by requesting an adjournment to secure the certificate confirming the Schedule 5 classification. This led to further testimony from the investigating officer, Captain Maisibe Ngoepe.

Ngoepe testified that he had obtained a CCTV video from Matsediso Primary School which showed the accused entering the school with two rifles and two pangas. However, only one firearm was handed to the police for ballistic testing.

Ngoepe said that witnesses he interviewed reported being threatened with a pistol by Mboro. He said the video showed shots fired from a rifle retrieved from a black BMW, believed to belong to Mboro, indicating that it was not a replica but a dangerous weapon.

Mboro and his co-accused face 12 charges, including kidnapping, possession of an unlicensed firearm, discharging a firearm, assault and malicious damage to property.

The hearing continues. DM