Dailymaverick logo

Maverick News

Maverick News

Malema comes out guns blazing against Treasury, calls for Godongwana’s resignation

Malema comes out guns blazing against Treasury, calls for Godongwana’s resignation
One day after the courts officially suspended the VAT hike, EFF leader Julius Malema has said that if Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana had any decency he would resign. At the same time, the party would not support a motion of no confidence in the minister, as it was the president’s prerogative to hire and fire ministers.

The overturning of the VAT hike — on Freedom Day — is the turning point for South Africa, claimed Julius Malema, leader of the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF). The party leader described it as a “victory for the Constitution”. 

At a media briefing at the party’s Winnie Madikizela-Mandela House headquarters in Johannesburg, Malema said 27 April 2025 was not only important because it was Freedom Day, but because it was a “turning point in the politics of South Africa and especially parliamentary politics”. 

“So to overturn a decision of April fools (the passing of the contested fiscal framework) on the 27th of April was a victory to the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa — (so) that fools will never undermine the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa for as long as the EFF is there,” Malema said. 

The briefing came after Sunday’s order by the Western Cape Division of the High Court, which effectively suspended the 0.5 percentage point VAT increase that had been a bone of contention in the country since its announcement by Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana in March. 

Malema said during the briefing that if Godongwana “had any decency, he would have resigned” after all the Budget drama. 

The EFF joined the Democratic Alliance (DA)’s court case to overturn the VAT hike —  which would have come into effect on 1 May 2025, despite an outcry from politicians, civil society and ordinary citizens. 

Read more: Freedom Day 2025 — official freedom from pending VAT increase

On Monday, reading from a prepared statement, Malema said: “this decisive court order vindicates the principal stance the EFF has consistently taken to defend the Constitution, the rule of law, and the interests of the poor and working class against political expediency and executive outreach overreach.” 

He added that the suspension of the VAT increase was a “necessary intervention against further economic suffocation”.

From the onset of the VAT controversy, the EFF — with its 39 seats in the National Assembly — had opposed a hike and voted no to passing the contested Fiscal Framework — a key step in the budgetary process. 

Malema said on Monday: “The EFF has long warned that the current minister of finance and the leadership of the National Treasury are incompetent, untrustworthy, and incapable of tabling a credible, believable, and lawful Budget.” 

The EFF had proposed several alternatives before parliamentary committees, including the rejection of the VAT hike, adjusting personal income tax brackets, increasing corporate taxes and the introduction of an apartheid wealth tax on underutilised and luxury land, which he claimed could “generate a once-off revenue of R30-billion to R50-billion”. 

Malema added that the ruling was not just a victory for the EFF, but a “victory for the people of South Africa. It is a victory for the rule of law.” 

He added: “It is a victory for the poor and working class who would have suffered greatly under the VAT increase.

Read more: It was me! – parties scramble to take credit for VAT reversal

“In light of this decisive judgment, the Economic Freedom Fighters called for the immediate resignation of Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana and the National Treasury Director-General Duncan Pieterse,” said Malema, adding: “These individuals have proven themselves incapable of formulating a lawful, credible, and developmental Budget.”

Malema said the pair had “lost the confidence of the people of South Africa and the business community should not trust them — it is the business community that has spent billions on changing their VAT system for nothing, and should pursue any means necessary to hold the government accountable”. 

EFF won’t support MK party


But in a surprising twist, Malema said the party would not support the uMkhonto Wesizwe party (MK party) in its motion of no confidence against Godongwana. 

The MK party announced on 25 April on its X account that it had submitted a request for the motion, based on what it terms the “reckless mishandling of the VAT matter”. 

Several times during the media briefing, Malema described the EFF as the official opposition — when in fact, this role is occupied by the MK party. 

Both parties are in a parliamentary grouping called the “Progressive Caucus”, formed to oppose the Government of National Unity (GNU). However, tensions between the EFF and MK party have simmered, especially after several EFF members, including former deputy president Floyd Shivambu, resigned and joined the party led by former president Jacob Zuma. 

Asked about the MK party’s motion, Malema was dismissive and said the EFF’s work was serious. He said that while the MK party had quantity and the title of official opposition, “in terms of substance... they are extremely, extremely challenged”. 

He said: “I mean, I saw them saying they are going to pass a motion of no confidence in Parliament on the minister of finance — I mean, what is that?” 

The veteran parliamentarian continued: “What type or what procedure is that one now —  because ministers are appointed by the president, they are not appointed by Parliament.” 

Malema went on to say that while parties could make a call about what they’d like, the final decision rested with the president. 

“Those are the types of stupid things we are not going to agree to,” he said. 

Malema said that instead, a motion of no confidence should be tabled against Cyril Ramaphosa. 

Explaining why the EFF joined the DA’s court application, Malema said it was because when two parties bring the same issues to court, they get grouped together, but fundamentally the two parties had different ideas about the VAT hike. 

Read Victoria O’Regan’s unpacking of the court hearings here: 


Day 1: Court battle unfolds as DA and EFF unite against controversial VAT increase

Day 2: VAT’s enough — Godongwana’s powers under scrutiny in high court challenge

Malema said his party stood ready to engage meaningfully to table “substantive proposals to ensure the new Budget focuses on economic recovery, industrialisation, mass employment, and the restoration of public services”. 

He said: “We will reject any attempts to impose budget cuts, austerity, or regressive taxation on the people of South Africa.” DM



Categories: