Dailymaverick logo

Business Maverick

Business Maverick

Minister Malatsi’s bid to get Starlink deal into orbit is weighed down by opposition gravity

Communications Minister Solly Malatsi is locked in an increasingly bitter struggle with parliamentary and telco industry opponents over proposed legislative amendments to pave the way for satellite communications services like Starlink to operate in SA.
Minister Malatsi’s bid to get Starlink deal into orbit is weighed down by opposition gravity

Elon Musk got more than 6,750 Starlink satellites into orbit and transmitting data, while Amazon’s Project Kuiper — the backbone of Vodafone’s sky internet plans — was still tying its laces.

The Project Kuiper plan is to get a constellation of 3,236 satellites up and running. Amazon needs to get half of them online in space by July next year or risk losing its Federal Communications Commission licence. The FCC is an independent agency of the United States federal government responsible for regulating interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite, and cable.

How many rockets has Amazon launched? Of the eight Atlas V and 38 Vulcan rockets booked with United Launch Alliance, none has been launched. The inaugural operations launch was scheduled for Wednesday, 9 April but was scrubbed because of inclement weather.

On the positive side, there are two prototypes in orbit from a 2023 launch that happened a month after Amazon signed the Vodafone deal.

So, for South Africa’s sky internet ambitions, that leaves Starlink as the only real player, with MTN quickly playing catch-up. But neither was at the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (Icasa) satellite framework public hearings in February to advocate for themselves.

“Everyone has the wrong end of the stick in this one,” said Nomvuyiso Batyi, the CEO of the Association of Comms and Technology (ACT), a lobby group representing major network operators including MTN, Vodacom, Telkom and Rain.

ACT has been raising concerns about Icasa’s proposed satellite services licensing framework. “It was only us and AfriForum there for all of the hearings. SpaceX [the company that operates Starlink] was there but then withdrew their statements,” she said.

The issue on the table


At the heart of the dispute is the part of the Electronic Communications Act, which mandates that “the percentage of equity ownership to be held by historically disadvantaged groups must not be less than 30% for any potential licensee” in South Africa’s telecommunications sector.

This requirement poses a significant hurdle for companies like Starlink, which has shown reluctance to dilute its global ownership structure to accommodate country-specific requirements.

The minister of communications and digital technologies, the DA’s Solly Malatsi, has signalled his intention to issue a policy directive on equity equivalent investment programmes (EEIPs) in the information and communications technology (ICT) sector, positioning them as an alternative pathway to fulfil transformation goals while accelerating broadband access.

Malatsi maintains that such programmes are “permissible by law” and have “been the source of major investments in our economy” in other sectors.

“Claims that these proposals undermine transformation are baseless and false,” Malatsi asserted in a media statement shared with Daily Maverick. “The government’s Medium Term Development Plan, formally approved by Cabinet, has adopted the introduction of EEIPs in the ICT sector.”

Diko fires back


The Portfolio Committee on Communications and Digital Technologies, chaired by Khusela Sangoni Diko, responded with unrestrained criticism, accusing Malatsi of attempting to “bypass the Electronic Communications Act to appease recalcitrant business interests”.

In a scathing statement issued on Monday, Diko declared: “Minister Malatsi should know that when it comes to transformation in the ICT sector, the law is clear on compliance and that cutting corners and circumvention is not an option — least of all to appease business interests.”

She alleged that the minister’s “proposed directives and regulations are an attempt to undermine empowerment legislation by stealth” and pledged they would be “fiercely opposed” if this were found to be the case.

New connectivity frontier 


The stakes in this regulatory battle could hardly be higher. South Africa continues to struggle with widespread digital inequality, with many rural areas remaining disconnected from reliable internet services.

LEO (low Earth orbit) satellite technology offers the potential to rapidly expand connectivity to these underserved regions without the massive infrastructure investments required by traditional terrestrial networks.

Industry players have also weighed in on the debate.

MTN CEO Ralph Mupita has advocated for “regulatory parity among all communications service providers, including satellite operators” and the principle of “same service, same rules”, suggesting the telecommunications giant favours a level playing field that would include satellite operators.

MTN, together with Lynk Global, recently conducted Africa’s first satellite-to-phone voice call, demonstrating the technology's potential.

Read more: Africa’s first satellite-to-phone call connects the unconnected

This achievement was acknowledged by Diko, who nevertheless used the occasion to warn against an “overreliance and obsession with a single satellite provider” — a thinly veiled reference to Starlink.

A long time coming 


“The telecommunications landscape has fundamentally changed. Revenue in the sector no longer comes from voice services, but has shifted significantly to data services,” explained Batyi.

Because of this rapid evolution and the focus on new technologies and services like data, she believes that the current legislation, which includes the Electronic Communications Act, needs to be updated or shifted. This potential legislative change might be necessary to address new realities in the sector, possibly affecting how things are accounted for and how services are offered to consumers.

Batyi’s concern revolves around the fairness of the consultation process and whether all stakeholders are given a fair opportunity to contribute to the regulatory framework that would govern satellite services — and potentially the deals involved.

“We have published white papers suggesting ways to update the 20-year-old legislation but have been ignored. Now this Starlink thing is being pushed through with pressure from the top,” she says — alluding to the February meeting between President Cyril Ramaphosa and Elon Musk as being the catalyst for this debate.

What does this mean for you? 


Communications Minister Solly Malatsi is pushing for regulatory changes to allow services like Starlink to operate in South Africa.

The main challenge is the requirement for telecommunications licensees to have 30% equity owned by historically disadvantaged groups.

Malatsi proposes alternative investment programmes but faces opposition from Parliament’s portfolio committee chair, Khusela Sangoni Diko.

The debate centres on how to expand internet access while adhering to empowerment laws.

The outcome will affect the speed of expanding internet access in rural areas and South Africa’s economic transformation agenda.

For millions of South Africans still waiting for reliable internet connectivity, particularly in rural areas, the outcome of this regulatory showdown will determine not just who provides their digital gateway, but whether that gateway opens sooner or later — and at what cost to the country’s transformation agenda.


Down to the line 


For now, South Africa’s regulatory framework remains unchanged, keeping Starlink and similar operators in a state of uncertainty regarding their ability to fully enter the market.

As the battle lines harden, both sides claim to be serving the national interest — Malatsi through accelerating digital access by embracing new technologies and investment models, and the portfolio committee through defending transformation laws they view as essential to meaningful economic change. DM

Comments (4)

Arnold O Managra Apr 11, 2025, 11:15 PM

We all know that "historically disadvantaged" in SA means "black African" or Bantu tribe, whether or not you're the sons or daughters, brothers, sisters of political or industrial heavyweights, having gone to elite private schools all your lives. All we know is that the 30% wealth tax on SA's people goes only to the Bantu elite. For good reason. Cultural authenticity. There's no miscomprehension. This is just culture leaking out. The culture of kings.

Glyn Morgan Apr 11, 2025, 08:35 PM

So, it all comes down to racist preferences.

Peter Handley Apr 11, 2025, 07:14 PM

The MTDP appears to make no specific reference to EEIPs in the ICT sector. The EEIP program is non-sector specific and directly addresses the BEE holding issue for multinationals that have difficulty meeting the requirement - ie such as the Starlink case. What are the facts not in evidence here? Why does the article not dig deeper and explain these to us rather than provide a somewhat superficial overview? On the stated facts, this appears to be an open and shut case.

michele35 Apr 11, 2025, 10:19 AM

I would understand if the opposition was driven by a quest for the person in the street to be the beneficiary of the 30% "empowerment" component but alas everyone knows including the person in the street that the 30% goes to cadres, friends and family. Unfortunately in the quest for self-interest they are taking down the whole country with them.

John Strydom Apr 11, 2025, 12:03 PM

You've put your finger right on it, Michele! Education and health could be the beneficiaries - what could be wrong with that?