Dailymaverick logo

South Africa

This article is more than a year old

South Africa

Prasa accused of contempt of court over failure to shelter evicted Cape Town families

Rail agency ordered to restore shelter to people it evicted from the Cape Town Foreshore in August.
Prasa accused of contempt of court over failure to shelter evicted Cape Town families

The Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (Prasa) has been accused of contempt of court for failing to adhere to a Western Cape Division of the High Court ruling of 6 September to shelter families it illegally evicted in August from Transnet-owned land along Old Marine Drive in Cape Town.

On Friday, Judge Tandazwa Ndita gave Prasa 24 hours to build “temporary habitable dwellings that afford shelter, privacy and amenities at least equivalent to those that were destroyed”.

But Prasa was nowhere to be seen on the weekend, and nothing has been done to date. GroundUp found people sleeping out in the cold without shelter.

In a statement on Monday, housing activist organisation Ndifuna Ukwazi said Prasa’s inaction was “a clear act of contempt”.

“Only after the 24 hours to comply with the order had expired did Prasa notify the high court of its intention to appeal the ruling. However, no formal application for the appeal has been filed as yet,” the statement said.

Some of the 38 people evicted said they had been living on the land for a decade.

Ally Al-Habsy, 64, a father of three children who had welcomed the court ruling last week, told GroundUp on Sunday: “The court made a decision and we were hoping by now they would comply… It is clear they don’t regard the law.”

“For weeks we have been living in these bad conditions. All we want is to be given back our material and we continue to live as we did.”

Fellow land occupier Brian Rodriguess said: “We deserve better than this. Prasa should comply and do the right thing.”

At the time of publication Prasa spokesperson Andiswa Makanda had not responded to GroundUp’s numerous attempts to get comment.

Later on Tuesday, Makanda responded: “Prasa notes the ruling handed down by the Western Cape High Court on the Foreshore occupiers. Prasa’s legal department has studied the judgment and, in consultation with legal counsel, has taken the decision to take the matter on appeal.” DM 

First published by GroundUp.

Comments (2)

peddledavid7 Sep 10, 2024, 05:42 PM

Persons can take your rights to a property as they wish while you are not there you have a narrow window to prevent them Miss the window they put a roof on or place personal stuff in the property your rights are nullified and you need a court order and a sheriff evict them This is utter madness

Stephen Mcbride Sep 11, 2024, 03:34 AM

There is a severe shortage of affordable housing in Cape Town. Whose job is it to provide this? Is there enough "unowned land" to provide this? Does the capitalist system allow for those who own it to provide this and make max profit? Agree PRASA not respons. We are

Stephen Mcbride Sep 11, 2024, 03:29 AM

Far more complicated. The very concept of ownership of property needs to be called into question. If you are using land few will question your right to keep that land. If you simply own the land two different views on whether you should be able to just leave it there whilst nothing for others

Naas Viljoen Sep 10, 2024, 03:40 PM

This occupation of PRASA land in bullsh^t. These people should not have been there in the first place. PRASA should not have to be responsible for their dwellings.

Stephen Mcbride Sep 11, 2024, 03:39 AM

Have we (as a country) provided space for the willing to work to work and get houses etc. Or is there no work available for them and no unowned land that they can use. If that is not the case we need to provide means. Those who do not want to work. Let them starve.