Dailymaverick logo

Politics

This article is more than a year old

Politics

SA gets a glimpse of a Multi-Party Charter coalition post the May elections and it's not pretty

The opposition Multi-Party Charter is not about trust or friendship, but the means to ensure the ANC is voted out of power on 29 May, ActionSA leader Herman Mashaba told the big debate on Thursday at Daily Maverick’s The Gathering Twenty Twenty-Four.
SA gets a glimpse of a Multi-Party Charter coalition post the May elections and it's not pretty Velenkosini Hlabisa speaks during The Big Debate during The Gathering Twenty Twenty-Four Election Edition at the Cape Town International Convention Centre on 14 March 2024. (Photo: Shelley Christians)

‘I am not in the business of trust. I am in the business of saving our country from the ANC... It has nothing to do with friendship, with trust,” Action SA leader Herman Mashaba told a full house at The Gathering at the Cape Town International Convention Centre on Thursday.

the gathering 2024 big debate Patriotic Alliance leader Gayton McKenzie, Justice Minister Ronald Lamola, DA leader John Steenhuisen, IFP leader Velenkosini Hlabisa, Action SA leader Herman Mashaba with moderators Stephen Grootes and Queenin Masuabi during at The Gathering Twenty Twenty-Four Election Edition at the Cape Town International Convention Centre on 14 March 2024. (Photo: Shelley Christians)



Just before that backhanded comment, his Multi-Party Charter (MPC) colleague, DA leader John Steenhuisen, had emphasised working together.

“We must work across party lines. This is the first time in 30 years the opposition is working together to protect the country against ANC corruption,” Steenhuisen said.

Read more in Daily Maverick: The Gathering 2024

Justice Minister and ANC MP Ronald Lamola would have none of it. “As the ANC, we are very clear we will still be the leader of this country and we will account to this country,” Lamola said.

Anyone who thought differently was in for a surprise, particularly the IFP, as the uMkhonto Wesizwe (MK) party was nibbling at its support in KwaZulu-Natal.

the gathering lamola Justice Minister Ronald Lamola addresses The Gathering Twenty Twenty-Four Election Edition at the Cape Town International Convention Centre on 14 March 2024. (Photo: Shelley Christians)



Unlike the IFP and DA, the ANC was not in an “unfriendly” and “untrusting” relationship, said Lamola, pointing out how Mashaba left the DA.

“They can’t even agree who will be the leader. You can’t have a coalition like this leading the country... They have to be functionalist,” Lamola said, appealing for all South Africans to pitch in to ensure the country’s future.

Read more in Daily Maverick: Elections 2024

Patriotic Alliance (PA) leader Gayton McKenzie butted in to take the conversation back to ex-president Jacob Zuma — now suspended from the ANC — and the political party for which he’s the poster face, MK.

the gathering gayton mckenzie Gayton McKenzie during The Gathering Twenty Twenty-Four Election Edition at the Cape Town International Convention Centre on 14 March 2024. (Photo: Shelley Christians)



The IFP, DA and ActionSA were pretending they were not worried about Zuma and the MK party, but they were strategising how to counter them, McKenzie said. “Jacob Zuma is going to be the wrecking ball of this election.”

Read more in Daily Maverick: DA and Zuma’s MK party big winners; ANC and EFF flop, new Brenthurst survey finds

It got heated as the discussion turned to the revolving door in coalitions at local government level, with the DA, ActionSA and the PA making sharp comments about each others’ conduct in Johannesburg and Ekurhuleni.

“Here’s your coalition government,” quipped Lamola, to laughter from the audience.

But IFP leader Velenkosini Hlabisa stood up for the MPC — and to reassure the audience the sharp exchanges they had seen between members of the MPS were an exception.

the gathering hlabisa Velenkosini Hlabisa during The Gathering Twenty Twenty-Four Election Edition at the Cape Town International Convention Centre on 14 March 2024. (Photo: Shelley Christians)



“We have worked a lot since May last year to get agreement... We can’t afford a coalition government that will fight against each other instead of dealing with the challenges of South Africa.”

Back to a more serious tone, Steenhuisen was asked about the DA’s stance on the Gaza-Israel war — effectively whether Israel is conducting a genocide in Gaza.

With the United Nations’ International Court of Justice considering South Africa’s genocide case against Israel, it was necessary to see the process through, the DA leader said, adding that did not mean having to wait to agree that what is happening must stop now.

“I think Ramadan offers us the best opportunity to make this clarion call to get the humanitarian [aid] in there and look for mature leadership in Palestine and Israel.”

Steenhuisen said South Africa’s democratic transition was an example to follow. The bombing of Gaza was not going to get the hostages released nor Israel’s border secured, but negotiations would.

Read more in Daily Maverick: Middle East crisis news hub

It was a more nuanced stance than that of five months ago. The DA, seen as pro-Israel, is understood to have lost just under two percentage points in its voting support over its stance on the Gaza-Israel war.

Concerns were expressed over the recent leak of political party candidates lists, for which the Electoral Commission of South Africa (IEC) has taken responsibility. Lamola said it was “the ANC lists” that were leaked. Steenhuisen shot back, “The DA lists were leaked Thursday,” saying this showed the “IEC is failing at the first hurdle”.

While Steenhuisen swatted away the furore over the DA letter asking for outside election observers, Lamola pointed out the IEC had run elections with stringent adherence to the regulations. South Africa traditionally has had independent election observers registered by the IEC, Lamola said.

Amid the repeated touts for votes — on the one hand for the MPC, and on the other for the governing ANC — the PA seemed to want a return to the apartheid dompas black South Africans were forced to carry, but this time with a xenophobic twist.

“You must carry documents [like passports]... I don’t care what nickname we give those documents,” McKenzie replied to a question about what such documents should be called.

But politicians are politicians and at the end of a heavy, sometimes loud debate, all smiled and shook hands.

It’s a foretaste of what’s to come over the next 2½ months of electioneering until the 29 May elections. DM

Comments (4)

roelf.pretorius Mar 18, 2024, 02:53 AM

. . . Then also, I can't agree more with Marianne that the younger, new politicians deserve a place at the table. I hope Zibi, Maimane & also Zackie Achmat and Lindiwe Mazibuko and Mbali Ntuli (I hope the last two are also standing) do well and bring the common sense into the debate in our politics that are seriously lacking. At the deputy presidents' dialogue on coalitions, when I tried to speak common sense, I had to speak against continuous heckling from these politicians that don't want new ideas or solutions - they only keep playing around with each other like there is no tomorrow and SA is fine because they are there. It is time that new political parties start to grow so we as voters have more options, and that all this old wood can be pushed out and consigned to the dustbin of history. Lastly, Gayton MacKenzie's comment about Zuma that will be the wrecking ball of this election has far more merit than what some people will admit - far more merit than MacKenzie himself because the PA, along with the EFF, MK and the UDM are all choices that SA can't afford in government. It is time that sober heads, like Lamola and Hlabisa, and these younger leaders, but also maybe the likes of Geordin Hill-Lewis and Chris Pappas, get considered more for national government than what is happening at the moment.

awilliams1@afrihost.co.za Mar 18, 2024, 12:44 PM

Nobody has mentioned that the orginal inhabitants of this beautiful land were the Khoi-San and EVERYBODY else invaded and conquered - one from the NE, the other from the SW. Difference in invasions was a few hundred years - between 100 and 300 years, depending on your authority. We all ought to be grateful to live in this magnificent land and to share what is not in fact ours, but what we have stolen. The Khoi-San lived lightly off the land and hardly left a mark - unlike the rest of ALL of us.

roelf.pretorius Mar 18, 2024, 02:38 AM

Well, I am happy to see the MPC taking each other on about the mess in the Gauteng metro's, because all of them, and the ANC, EFF and PA, are co-responsible. The reason for the mess is the political instability that then also demoralizes the officials that have to deliver the services, especially as half of the political parties are more interested in looting and interfering in their (the officials') jobs than service delivery. And maybe, in the process, the DA will at last get the message that in coalition politics they can't act as if the smaller coalition partners are joining them. Maybe it should not be a surprise that Lamola was the one who kept his cool - after all he was the one person who actually has some experience in governing. So the person who, according to me, stands out in this crowd, at least measuring against what this article says, is Hlabisa, because he also seemed to keep his cool although he did NOT have Lamola's experience. My only regret is that I was not able to attend virtually; there was some urgent matter that kept me going not just on Thursday, but it is still going on. Let us hope that some of these leaders will find each other, and that the EFF and MK will not be in government to steal what is left in SA.

Rory Macnamara Mar 17, 2024, 09:29 AM

without trust this group is destined to fail. trust is about respect and the ability to listen and adapt, it is not about being friendly or buddy buddy. Mr mashaba you have just lost your group a vote.

Stephen Mcbride Mar 17, 2024, 06:50 AM

At the root of the problem is CODESA which instituted a party electoral system. In this the majority of the people vote for a party with a manifesto that they have no need to follow and for people they do not know. What other method is there? Voting is done on a site level for your representative. Street or block level for where you live. Work place level. 1 person workplaces places in groups based on interest. These representatives then meet and get to know each other and elect someone for each industry / area / expertise. In this way each group is represented and have a voice and people are elected on their ability to get things done amongst people they know. They oversee and do not run the country. They agree who to employ for each job based on competence. Lots of details left out such as how do we keep the people up the line accountableas the further up you go the less they know each other. How do the grassroots vote in new people and show their disgust with how the higher ups running the country. How do you ensure that grassroots go for the bigger good and not personal gain. But anything has to be better than party politics