Dailymaverick logo

Opinionistas

This is an opinion piece.
The views expressed are not that of Daily Maverick.....

This article is more than a year old

'I can't afford solar power...I, among many South Africans, would like to be heard'

The reality is that we don’t need a few, big renewable energy installations. We need many small, localised supply interventions. But nobody wants to do the hard work.

I write as a citizen of South Africa. My street cred is that I am a single mom with a disability and I can’t afford solar power. My professional cred is that I am a qualified and experienced environmentalist and I have worked in the renewable energy sector in various roles, including research around the transition. 

I, among many other South Africans, would like to be heard.

Knowing what I know about climate change and the very real, very urgent need for a transition away from fossil fuels is not enough. It’s not enough to motivate me to invest my scarce funds into solar energy panels. It’s not enough for me to invest time in finding out what energy alternatives are on offer (where is a central hub of knowledge on solar power technology for households?!).

I am, frankly, put off by the male-driven, low-access, user-unfriendly sources. I am put off by the exorbitant costs of investment in such technologies. I know that the long-term investment will pay off, but as a woman with a chronic degenerative disease, I have other priorities.

And so I am aware of how most South Africans must feel. If I am in this position, and I am highly educated and privileged, how are the majority of South Africans coping?

I recently watched a webinar about the challenges of the Just Energy Transition Partnership (JETP) programmes in South Africa, Indonesia and Vietnam. The JETP, boiled down to its nutshell, should represent a relatively low-cost way for South Africa to “rapidly cut emissions and stimulate private investment in clean energy, electrification and other green technologies”.

I am not going to delve into the politics involved (there are more than enough other articles in Daily Maverick on this). I want to know how the country is working together to make this transition safe and affordable for everyone, including me. And Fatima. And Blywell. And Siphokazi.

The webinar included South African researcher Dr Tracy Ledger of the Public Affairs Research Institute. Ledger said something that resonated strongly with me – “we can’t address our energy priority until we address energy poverty”.

This should be the logo of the Just Transition. Even though we are facing pressing climate change impacts, and even though we need renewable energy ASAP, we cannot continue to bypass the needy. This then further entrenches inequality and deepens poverty.

Poverty is a vicious circle that is now spiralling inwards with the impacts of load shedding – less access to affordable power. Ledger quoted a study which showed that households with affordable access to electricity are three times more likely to start a small business.

Light, power and the internet provide households with some resilience. We need this level of resilience to face climate change shocks.

I am angry that the Global North is not offering realistic incentives or grant funding for the Just Transition. Apparently, the JETP package share of grants in the new arrangement amounts to less than 3%.

I am angry that it’s going to be distributed in the old, worn-out methods of power politics. I am angry that I, as a South African citizen who has worked with government institutions for years, am so easily ignored.

I resent that, despite good case studies and evidence, we never see transformative, systemic changes. I, and many others, have been singing the song of decentralised community-based approaches for years, for water and energy.

The reality is that we don’t need a few, big installations. We need many small, localised supply interventions. But nobody wants to do the hard work.

Why on earth do the Just Transition funders not provide funding to facilitative agencies? Organisations that work to bring coherence and co-creation at the coalface, excuse the pun? The ones who make changes? The ones on the ground, who work with communities to catalyse change? 

It boils down to a lack of willingness to lose power by the people we voted into power.

At the very least, get renewable energy developments to integrate socially just frameworks into their processes. 

At the very least, invest in affordable renewable energy solutions for poor households. 

At the very least, don’t let load shedding destroy our water quality too (don’t get me started on this one). DM

For tickets to Daily Maverick’s The Gathering Earth Edition, click here.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REeWvTRUpMk

Comments (5)

Robert Simmons May 13, 2023, 05:21 PM

About 9 years ago, when undertaking environmental assessments for an Spanish IPP developing wind energy facilities in South Africa, the client predicted that, as in Spain, once Eskom no longer had the monopoly on energy supply and distribution, then healthy competition would arise, efficiency would increase, supply would increase and electricity supply ( not to mention the innovations you mention Christy) would flourish. Alas Eskom are still in charge, our Spanish friends with technical know-how streets ahead of Eskom, were kicked out (by Eskom renaging on a distribution agreement), and here we are a decade with no direction, no power, and no competition. To paraphrase John Maytham, when asked why he sighs so much he replied, there's a lot to sigh about....

Josie Rowe-Setz May 11, 2023, 05:53 PM

There are some very good papers ilon small community energy systems, which work financially and increase life quality, and earnings. Check out the case work on Scottish wind energy on islands and in remore areas and for municipalities. In SA could be replicated but mix of wind/solar/biomass. Important to be able to sell surplus back into grid though. Thanks for article.

Beth Bartlett May 11, 2023, 05:42 PM

Nailed it Christy, thank you

Tom Boyles May 6, 2023, 09:17 AM

I agree with some of the criticisms here. What has this got to do with gender? But it's also inaccurate. 'I know it will pay off in the long run' is nonesense and I would expect more from her. Unless you are a very high end user of daytime electricity, a basic domestic solar system never pays for itself. If like me, your family is at school or work during the week, much of the solar energy is wasted and extra storage is incredibly expensive. Without grid buy back schemes my savings don't cover the interest payments on the capital, let alone pay off the capital. So please do better research and don't fall for the 'it pays itself off in 5 years' nonesense that the companies spin.

dBritBoer Maverick May 6, 2023, 08:17 AM

Many electronic devices actually run off 12v - even 32" android tvs have a 12v connection if you open up the back! (look on YouTube) What I have done is connect an old 12v DStv power supply (free) straight onto an old 12v car battery (R500) and then to my 5G Rain router, as well as a 3 socket cigarette lighter "multiplug" I got at a Chinese store (R150) which takes car chargers for charging my phone and tablet. The small alarm system backup batteries also work but don’t last 4 hours. Then I have 2 of the Magneto 24 led “box lights” (R250 each) which switch on automatically when the power goes off. At least I have wifi, lights and charging during blackouts. If necessary, I cook and boil water on a 3kg gas bottle with a single plate (about R1000). I also have an as yet unused heater attachment for the gas bottle for deep winter cold. Is this the kind of thing you’re asking about? Reply