Dailymaverick logo

World

This article is more than a year old

World

Trump takes 'presidential absolute immunity' battle to US Supreme Court

Slowing down the case could play to Trump's advantage, as if he wins the November election and returns to the White House, he could use his presidential powers to force an end to the prosecution or potentially pardon himself for any federal crimes.
Trump takes 'presidential absolute immunity' battle to US Supreme Court

Donald Trump on Monday turned to the US Supreme Court as he presses his claim - rejected by lower courts - that he is immune from being prosecuted for trying to overturn his 2020 election loss because he was serving as president when he took those actions.

Trump asked the justices to put on hold a ruling by a three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejecting his immunity claim. A March 4 trial date for Trump in federal court in Washington on four criminal counts pursued by Special Counsel Jack Smith was postponed, with no new date yet set.

Trump's lawyers asked the justices to halt the trial proceedings pending their bid for the full slate of judges on the DC Circuit to reconsider the case, and, if necessary, an appeal to the Supreme Court.

Trump, the first former president to be criminally prosecuted, is the frontrunner for the Republican nomination to challenge Democratic President Joe Biden in the November 5 US election. Biden defeated Trump in 2020.

Slowing down the case could play to Trump's advantage, as if he wins the November election and returns to the White House, he could use his presidential powers to force an end to the prosecution or potentially pardon himself for any federal crimes.

Three of the nine Supreme Court justices were appointed by Trump, cementing a 6-3 conservative majority on the top US judicial body. The charges brought by Smith in August 2023 came in one of four criminal cases now pending against Trump, including another one in a Georgia state court also involving his efforts to undo his 2020 loss.

US District Judge Tanya Chutkan, presiding over the case brought by Smith, in December rejected Trump's immunity claim, ruling that former presidents "enjoy no special conditions on their federal criminal liability".

"Whatever immunities a sitting president may enjoy, the United States has only one chief executive at a time," Chutkan wrote, "and that position does not confer a lifelong 'get-out-of-jail-free' pass."

After Trump appealed, the DC Circuit's three-judge panel on February 6 also rebuffed Trump's immunity claim, prompting him to seek relief at the Supreme Court.

"We cannot accept that the office of the presidency places its former occupants above the law for all time thereafter," the panel wrote in its decision.

During arguments before the DC Circuit in January, one of Trump's lawyers told the court that even if a president sold pardons or military secrets or ordered a Navy commando unit to assassinate a political rival, he could not be criminally charged unless he is first impeached and convicted in Congress.

Prosecutors have argued that Trump was acting as a candidate, not a president, when he pressured officials to overturn the election results and encouraged his supporters to march to the Capitol on January 6 2021, to pressure Congress not to certify Biden's victory.

The indictment secured by Smith accuses Trump of conspiring to defraud the United States, obstructing the congressional certification of Biden's electoral victory and conspiring to do so, and conspiring against the right of Americans to vote.

Trump last October sought to have the charges dismissed based on his claim of immunity from criminal prosecution related to actions taken by a president while in office. Trump, president from 2017 to 2021, has regularly made sweeping claims of immunity both while in office and since leaving the White House.

The US Supreme Court in 2020 spurned Trump's argument that he was immune from a subpoena issued as part of a state criminal investigation while he was president.

The Supreme Court in December declined Smith's request to decide the immunity claim even before the DC Circuit ruled - a bid by the prosecutor to speed up the process of resolving the matter. The justices opted instead to let the lower appeals court rule first, as is customary.

Separately, the Supreme Court heard arguments on February 8 in Trump's appeal of a ruling by Colorado's top court that barred him from the state's Republican primary ballot, based on language in the US Constitution's 14th Amendment, after finding he engaged in an insurrection related to the January 6 2021 attack on the Capitol by his supporters.

Comments (2)

SATRADENET Feb 13, 2024, 11:04 AM

I am sure most americans would rather have a half senile fumbling Biden than a totally deranged narcassistic reprobate who thinks he is above the law.

John P Feb 13, 2024, 01:54 PM

Agreed, Biden at least has a support crew and listens to them as opposed to the spoilt little boy who never grew up and is a complete loose cannon.

Ben Harper Feb 13, 2024, 01:42 PM

I wouldn't be too sure about that

Graeme de Villiers Feb 13, 2024, 01:25 PM

200 million Americans appear to think differently, bizarrely.

Fanie Rajesh Ngabiso Feb 13, 2024, 06:43 AM

So Trump is implicitly acknowledging guilt, but fighting the semantics whether hes some kind of protected species? The world is truly crazy. And the parallels to our lovely South African Stalingrad defense too great.

Ben Harper Feb 13, 2024, 10:14 AM

He's not necessarily admitting guilt, he's using the rather twisted US justice system to his advantage, he's saying even if he did what they say he did, he is immune as it is alleged he did it when he was a sitting president and the sitting president enjoys such immunity