Dailymaverick logo

South Africa

This article is more than a year old

South Africa

Court denies Jacob Zuma’s second special bid to have Billy Downer removed from arms deal case

The former president has lost his latest plea to have advocate Billy Downer removed as prosecutor in the arms deal graft case.
Court denies Jacob Zuma’s second special bid to have Billy Downer removed from arms deal case

The Pietermaritzburg High Court has dismissed Jacob Zuma’s latest application to have advocate Billy Downer removed as prosecutor of his arms deal corruption trial. 

Delivering the judgment on Wednesday morning, Judge Nkosinathi Chili said the former president had failed to show that Downer’s presence as his prosecutor would violate his right to a fair trial. Zuma had asked for the recusal of Downer, whom he accused of prosecutorial bias, which, he said, would mean he would not get a fair trial if he led the State’s case.

Read more in Daily Maverick: Diamond dealer Louis Liebenberg helps boost MK’s Gauteng fortunes

“I am not persuaded that Mr Zuma succeeded in establishing that the retention of Mr Downer as the prosecutor in this matter could prejudice his right to a fair trial enshrined in Section 35 of Subsection 3 of the Constitution. 

“I therefore make the following order: The application for the removal of Mr Downer as the public prosecutor in the criminal prosecution of Mr Zuma and Thales South Africa (Pty) Ltd is dismissed. Reasons shall be incorporated in my judgment,” Judge Chili said. 




The judge said he would only provide the reasons for his judgment “at the end of the trial”, after Zuma’s lawyer, Dali Mpofu, had requested them “to trigger any further proceedings”. 

The former president was not present in court on Wednesday morning. 

Read more in Daily Maverick: MK party argues ANC failed to oppose its registration before Jacob Zuma joined

This is the second attempt by Zuma to have Downer removed from trying the arms deal corruption case after his first special plea failed in October 2021, when it was rejected by former trial judge Piet Koen. 

Zuma subsequently brought a fresh application against Downer in 2023, after Koen recused himself from continuing with the matter

The former president has for years used Stalingrad tactics, ill health and an undisclosed medical condition to delay court proceedings and to avoid facing criminal prosecutions in the case. 

In 2022, Zuma laid criminal charges against Downer and then tried to prosecute him privately, along with journalist Karyn Maughan, whom Zuma accused of colluding with Downer to publish details of his medical records illegally.

Read in Daily Maverick: Zuma’s Stalingrad defence disintegrates after judges quash latest legal gambit in scathing judgment

The Supreme Court of Appeal, in October 2023, dismissed Zuma’s application against Maughan and Downer, with costs. 

On Wednesday, Downer said the State is firmly against further delays in the case and asked that Judge Chili set trial dates imminently. 

“We’re now sitting in March 2024 for a trial which has been the subject of abuse and delay for six years – to start further down the line than six months from now we just find it unacceptable… The State’s attitude is that this matter must go to trial as soon as possible,” Downer said. 

Mpofu said he was “absolutely astounded” and “disappointed” with Downer’s remarks, and complained that Downer did not talk to Zuma’s legal team about the progress of the trial.

At the conclusion of Wednesday’s proceedings, Judge Chili postponed the matter to 17 May for a pretrial conference. DM

Comments (3)

Mendo Gampu Mar 23, 2024, 02:50 AM

It's getting somewhere,poor Msholozi what a con of his legal team draining now it's all over the journey will soon start Stallingrad tactics are steady but surely dwindling

Alan Salmon Mar 21, 2024, 09:34 PM

I cannot understand why Zuma is allowed to continue to waste the court's time like this when there are many other more important matters to be heard !! He should never have been allowed to appeal the original judgment when he had no likelihood of succeeding. Our legal system urgently needs reform to prevent this nonsense.

Ian McGill Mar 21, 2024, 09:19 AM

Surely being a prosecutor means you have the evidence to think the accused is guilty? How can a prosecutor be biased?

Con Tester Mar 21, 2024, 10:17 AM

Exactly. The mere fact that a prosecutor means to prosecute you can already be construed as bias against you but it's a legal nonsense because on that basis, no prosecution could ever succeed.