Dailymaverick logo

Maverick Life

Maverick Life, DM168

Brenda Fassie’s Vulindlela asks difficult questions about South Africa’s nation-building

Brenda Fassie’s Vulindlela asks difficult questions about South Africa’s nation-building
Brenda Fassie in 1987. (Photo: Joe Sefale / Sunday Times / Gallo Images / Getty Images)
Much-loved artist Brenda Fassie was a childlike rebel whose music became an anthem for freedom in South Africa.

In 1997, South Africa’s most famous music star had a huge hit. Brenda Fassie’s Vulindlela became a national pop anthem, played especially at weddings and all kinds of celebrations.

Vulindlela can be translated from the isiZulu as an instruction to “make way” or, if you like, “clear the path”. The song is about making way for the groom (and bride) at their wedding. South Africa was emerging from the racist apartheid system in 1997 and was celebrating its own “wedding” across the colour bar after democratic elections three years before.

Apartheid and its policy of separate development for different ethnic groups made black women like Fassie vulnerable and ­subject to rural existence or life in townships. These were residential areas on the outskirts of cities designated for black people by the white minority rulers. Yet Fassie defied all norms.

Born in 1964, she began her rise to fame in the townships in the 1980s, but soon took over the nation’s airwaves. She died at the age of 40 in 2004. Her hit songs – like Weekend Special, Too Late for Mama and Black President – encompassed disco and pop energies, political statements, ballads and the use of local languages.

Fassie is also remembered as a “bad girl” because she didn’t colour neatly within the lines of what is expected of women in society. She was a sex-positive, drug-taking media sensation who danced and dressed provocatively during the height of apartheid and became known as the first openly bi­­sexual celebrity in South Africa.

Fassie was nothing short of rebellious. She rebelled through fashion, language, sexuality and even through an often childlike nature that can be seen in her performances.

I believe it’s important that Fassie be remembered as a figure of rebellion. In my doctoral thesis I look at how some women in South African popular culture like Fassie, singer Lebo Mathosa and actress Khanyi Mbau have made an impact on the sociopolitical fabric of the country by presenting themselves in rebellious ways.

As a scholar of gender, feminist theory and popular culture, I argue that this rebellion happens when black women challenge, complicate and create possibilities for themselves and other women beyond the confines of what is deemed “respectable”.

Rebelling in the ways that Fassie did can even reveal the possibilities for nation-building processes. A deeper reading of Vulindlela is a good way to explain what I mean.

Vulindlela’s deeper messages


Vulindlela was a national sensation for many reasons. Its contagious rhythms invite the body to dance. It plays on the cultural significance and joys of a wedding.

It symbolically ties this to the political moment, capturing the optimism of the new South Africa – where paths are being cleared of obstacles so that there can be a successful union.

The first black president of South Africa, Nelson Mandela, could well be imagined as the groom in this wedding.

Brenda Fassie Brenda Fassie in 1987. (Photo: Joe Sefale / Sunday Times / Gallo Images / Getty Images)



Rebelliously, Fassie re­­leased Black President in 1990. It was about Mandela, who had been imprisoned for his struggle against apartheid. Although Mandela had just been released and apartheid was beginning to end, this kind of political statement was still prohibited by the apartheid state. Black President was duly banned.

With Vulindlela, Fassie cleverly captured the sentiments of freedom and op­­timism that followed Man­­dela becoming the country’s first black president. His party, the ANC, even used Vulindlela in its 1999 election ­campaign.

The timing of Vulindlela was also redemptive for her. She was struggling with drug addiction, and making headlines for her outspoken views on sex and countless on-stage dramas.

Peddling in the euphoria of the time while navigating her “wild child” and “national darling” personas, Fassie’s comeback helped South Africans to imagine a new country that embraced all its people – even the most rebellious.

In my study I think about Fassie – and Mathosa and Mbau – as part of a broader lineage of women who are today (contentiously) termed slay queens.

I don’t subscribe to the narrow, patriarchal view of slay queens as unambitious women with Barbie doll make-up and long nails who seek companionship from wealthy men. I argue that slay queens rebel against the shame attached to women who either do not satisfy traditional gender and sexuality norms, or who dare to be whatever and whoever they desire to be in order to satisfy their full humanity.

Many of us are actually slay queens – some in disguise.

South Africa, like much of the world, is still plagued by the politics of respectability: the codes of conduct considered normal and acceptable in society. Usually, it’s girls and women who must stick to respectability politics when it comes to their behaviour, what they say and how they dress – to satisfy men’s expectations.

When slay queens like Fassie emerge in a male-­domi­nant, sexist society, they present a compli­cation for respectability politics. And with it, how South Africans ima­­­gine gender roles, sexuality and the nation.

Vulindlela’s wedding plays into the foundations of a new nation. The nation can be seen as an imagined family or community and that family is commonly a nuclear family with a dad, mom and children.

Think of male presidents and their first ladies across the globe. The children are the nation’s citizens – and Fassie is the rebel child. The childlike persona that Fassie embodied is part of her impact.

She performed Vulindlela at the 2001 Kora All Africa Music Awards wearing a school uniform and holding a lunchbox.

Mandela – fondly called “uTata” (father) – was in the audience and Fassie handed him a banana. This reminds us of children sharing lunchboxes with one another. The banana, of course, can also work as a mischievous sexual symbol or as a metaphor of handing over a baton of power and responsibility.

Citizens as children may open up critical conversations about how people expect to be taken care of politically, economically and socially.

Vulindlela invites South Africans to ask difficult and necessary questions about their future as citizens. Do their leaders fully represent the nation – including the rebel girl child? Or is it still a case of “children are to be seen, not heard”? Who is included in and excluded from the family?

As a queer woman and bad girl, Fassie symbolises those who are most often excluded. As a symbol of sexual freedom she asks: can we afford weddings that won’t end in at least one out of three of the guests getting raped by the end of the night? (The rape crisis in South Africa was, after all, addressed by her in her music.)

I argue that Fassie helps to expose the “new” South Africa and instead reveals the true South Africa and its sexist, homo­phobic society.

But, as the sister of the nation, she also offers a solution. Fassie’s songs often emphasise her love for community and the township, showing her relationship with ubuntu (the practice of humanity) in a previously inhumane country.

South Africa is celebrating 30 years of democracy. For me, Vulindlela invites us to consider what way we are opening and for whom. DM 

First published in The Conversation.

Mbali Mazibuko is a senior lecturer in anthropology and development studies at the University of Johannesburg.

This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R35.